One size (diet) does not fit all!

by Mary C. Weaver, CSCS on January 6, 2012

So here we are in January. Your New Year’s resolutions are still all fresh and shiny, and chances are good you’ve already started trying to shed a few pounds or exercise more or eat your vegetables like Mom told you.

If you’re dieting, you’ve probably adopted a plan described in a magazine article or a diet book. It might look like a good food plan—but how can you know whether it provides enough calories?

Here’s how to figure that out—and why it’s so important.

Many diet plans for women recommend somewhere between 1,000 and 1,300 calories a day, and that simply isn’t enough energy for you to exercise, protect your lean muscle tissue, and stave off hunger. That is, unless you’re a very small person or have a slow metabolism.

Maybe you’re thinking, But I’m in a hurry to shed this fat—so if I cut more calories, I can get lean faster.

I understand that you’re hot to fit into your skinny jeans, but cutting calories too severely is likely to backfire. Why?

  • You’re going to feel more hungry and deprived—and thus are more likely to cheat.
  • You’ll burn not just fat but also lean muscle, the engine that drives your metabolic rate and helps you burn more calories all day long.
  • Your levels of the appetite-regulating hormones leptin and ghrelin will get out of whack, causing an increase in hunger. And who wants to end up after a diet with less muscle, more hunger, and a slower metabolism?

Have I gotten your attention? Good. Now I’m going to explain a better, smarter way than following a “one size fits all” diet plan.

woman working out with weights

You can’t preserve your hard-won muscles if you don’t get enough calories. Source: iStockphoto.com

Gathering information

Using a quick online calculator, you can get a fast and fairly accurate assessment of your total daily energy expenditure (TDEE). That’s the sum of the calories you burn just existing (basal metabolic rate) and through physical activity.

You can find one here. It’s free, fast, and super-easy to use.

The calculator will ask for your height, weight, age, and sex. It’s also going to ask you to choose an activity level, from sedentary through extremely active. The activity levels are defined as follows:

  • Sedentary—person doesn’t exercise at all
  • Lightly active—person does light activity or sports one to three times weekly
  • Moderately active—person does moderate activity or sports three to five days a week
  • Very active—person does hard exercise or sports six or seven days a week
  • Extremely active—person trains intensely more than once a day or performs a job that is very physical

Once you plug in those numbers and select an activity level, you’ll get an instant estimate of “average actual metabolism” (your TDEE) and resting metabolism (the number of calories you’d burn if you performed no activity at all).

Yes, there is individual variation: some people require more energy (calories) than the estimate; some need less. But the number gives you a good place to start. You can always adjust as needed if you discover that you seem to burn more or fewer calories.

Figuring out how many calories to consume 

Now that you’ve got your estimate, you can make a smart decision about how many calories to cut.

The most sensible strategy is to reduce calories by a specific percentage: 15 to 20 percent for a moderate pace of fat loss, 25 to 30 percent if you want to be more aggressive.

You can safely be more aggressive if you have a lot of fat to lose and do not have a history of losing, then regaining weight.

If you’re smaller (and have 20 pounds or less to shed) or have been on and off diets for years, the more conservative approach is preferable.

Grab a calculator, and let’s figure this out.

The “average actual metabolism” (TDEE) number you determined above is your maintenance level—the number of calories it takes to keep your weight steady. Decide which percentage of calorie restriction you want to use: 15, 20, 25, or 30 percent.

Multiply TDEE by the percentage. If, for example, your TDEE is 2,200 and you want to cut calories by 25 percent, that’s 2,200 x .25, and the result is 550. That’s the number of calories to cut from your daily intake.

Subtract that result from TDEE to get the number of calories to eat daily while on your diet. In this example, that’s a TDEE of 2,200 – 550, which equals 1,650. At that rate, you should burn a pound of fat about every 6.4 days (subject to individual variation).

If you want to lose fat more quickly, consider increasing your activity level rather than cutting back on food.

Make sense?

Does this sound like a whole lot more food than a lot of diets permit? And, um, do you think it might be easier to stick to than that 1,000-calorie-a-day plan in your women’s magazine?

Please share your thoughts and experiences in the comment box. Let me know how your diet’s going!

{ 17 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Ann Olson (@TheWellnessChick)
Twitter:
January 6, 2012 at 9:16 am

Hi Mary – it’s nice to connect outside of Twitter :) I can tell you this is a very sound strategy for figuring out your caloric intake. From day 1 of my diet (I’ve lost around 40lbs so far), I used this method to figure out my appropriate dietary intake, using the 20% estimation. This usually results in a 1 to 2lb loss per week and is very manageable.
Ann Olson (@TheWellnessChick)´s last [type] ..A Simple Way to Fit in Cardio (If You Hate It!)

Reply

2 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 11:58 am

Hi, Ann—thanks so much for commenting! I appreciate your kind words. Sounds like you are enjoying fabulous results! You go, girl!
Mary C. Weaver, CSCS´s last [type] ..What would you rather be—strong or skinny?

Reply

3 Suzanne @WorkoutNirvana
Twitter:
January 6, 2012 at 1:34 pm

Thanks Mary! Excellent info as always! I carry this calculator around in my smart phone so I can calculate how many calories my clients should cut. Everyone needs to know their own personal number – good job giving women the tools they need and explaining things in a straightforward manner.
Suzanne @WorkoutNirvana´s last [type] ..Step Up to Strong, Sexy Glutes

Reply

4 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Suzanne—very cool! Your clients are lucky to have you.

Reply

5 Blake Robinson January 6, 2012 at 2:59 pm

Great article Mary! I use what my goal weight is and calculate my caloric needs from there, what is your opinion on this practice? There will be more and more diets each year because there will always be something that works for someone but diets in my opinion are like prescription meds, don’t share and don’t do em unless directed to do so by a doctor.

Reply

6 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 12:13 pm

Hi, Blake–

Thanks for commenting! Your strategy makes a lot of sense. In my post I outlined the simpler strategy for figuring out caloric needs. The slightly more complicated one takes into account how much lean mass (muscle, bone, organs, skin) a person has. Why? Lean mass gives a more precise indication of total daily energy expenditure.

By calculating your needs according to your future weight, you’re sort of, kind of basing it on your lean mass because you’re pretending the fat mass has gone away.

If you don’t know what your lean mass is now, you can get a pretty good idea of it by using the calculator on my website: http://primefit.org/estimate-your-bodyfat/. It’s based on what’s called the Navy method. All you need are a tape measure and a scale.

Once you have that info, you can google the Katch-McArdle formula, which calculates TDEE from lean mass. Here’s a web calculator for running the equation: http://www.cordianet.com/calculator.htm.

Comment again here if you have any questions! I will be happy to help.

Reply

7 Janine @ ThePurpleGiraffe
Twitter:
January 6, 2012 at 7:34 pm

Great post! It’s so important for people to realize that FOOD IS FUEL. And to get maximum results from your efforts, you need to fuel yourself! Can’t wait to read more!
Janine @ ThePurpleGiraffe´s last [type] ..Today is the day!

Reply

8 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 3:14 pm

Hi, Janine–

Thank you for commenting!

Reply

9 Yolanda January 7, 2012 at 9:58 am

This makes so much more sense than depravation and re-runs on TV. Up your exercise level, cut your calories. Good solid advice!
Yolanda´s last [type] ..Red.Hot.Momentum on the Air – We’re LIVE!

Reply

10 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 12:07 pm

Yolanda—you got it in one! Thanks for commenting.

Reply

11 Sarah Arrow
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 11:43 am

Hi Mary,
Interesting post and I agree with your one diet doesn’t suit us all, but can it really be as simple as cutting 15-20% of the calories that we eat?
Sarah Arrow´s last [type] ..Steven Pressfield, George RR Martin, Misery and Me

Reply

12 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 12:06 pm

Hi, Sarah–

That’s a good question—and one that leads directly to the blog post I’ll be writing later today. The simplistic answer is yes. [And I know you know that exercise is essential to the fat-loss process too.]

That said, we also have to consider the nutritional quality of our food. Two women with the same caloric needs are cutting the same number of calories. One is consuming mostly Twinkies and Coke. The other is eating salmon, chicken, oatmeal, sweet potatoes, broccoli, apples, etc. Both of them will burn fat. One of them is consuming a very good diet that ensures optimum health. The other is eating food that can lead only to ill health. But yes, both of them will burn fat.

Here’s the essence of a bombshell study published this week: the nutrient composition of the diet (how much protein, carb, and fat) made a huge difference in the *body* composition of people who overate by 1,000 calories a day. One key finding: those who overate a low-protein diet gained fat (duh) and also *lost* muscle. This is astonishing.

I bring this up to say that it lends weight (no pun intended) to the long-held belief that consuming sufficient protein is absolutely vital to protect lean muscle—especially when people are dieting.

Hope this makes sense. More on this topic at PrimeFit by tomorrow morning!

Reply

13 Sarah Arrow
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 1:11 pm

thank you for a comprehensive answer, I shall look forward to reading the article on Prime Fit.

Reply

14 Lisa Pietsch
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 12:45 pm

Great information, Mary! We really need more people (and publications) to understand the value of more lean muscle. So few understand how much easier it is to build muscle and boost activity than just starving themselves.
*BTW whoever that photo model is, HER BACK IS FANTASTIC!*
Lisa Pietsch´s last [type] ..I Like How it Feels!

Reply

15 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 7, 2012 at 3:14 pm

Hi, Lisa—thanks!

And yes, isn’t that model dishy? I don’t have a clue who she is.

Reply

16 Christine Miller
Twitter:
January 13, 2012 at 3:18 am

a calculator sounds like a great idea – will check out the ones for the smart phones, thank you Mary.
Christine Miller´s last [type] ..Work as Play

Reply

17 Mary C. Weaver, CSCS
Twitter:
January 13, 2012 at 9:34 am

Christine–
Thanks for visiting and commenting! Let me know if you find a good body-comp calculator for smart phone. I want one!

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: